gno.law

Columbia Coffee & Spice Co. v. Le Baron Bros. & Nelson

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2184. · 1917-09-25 · Published · 168 P. 700 · 34 Cal. App. 715 · 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 201

COLUMBIA COFFEE AND SPICE CO. (A Corporation), Appellant, v. LE BARON BROS. & NELSON (A Corporation), Respondent

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
Edgar T. Zook
Outcome
other — Pres
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

The only question to be determined on this appeal is as to whether there is evidence in the record to sustain the trial court’s finding as to where certain merchandise, consisting of a quantity of onions and potatoes, was to be delivered in good, merchantable condition. It is claimed by the plaintiff that the defendant agreed that said produce should arrive in a marketable condition at a distant foreign port; while the defendant, on the other hand, contends that San Francisco was the point of delivery to which the guar *716 antee as .to the condition of the produce had reference. The evidence shows that part of the goods on their arrival at the foreign port was decayed and unmerchantable, but there is evidence to sustain the finding of the court that the extent of defendant’s warranty was that the potatoes and onions should be in good, marketable condition at San Francisco. This court, therefore, under the familiar rule relating to the presence of a conflict in the evidence, will not disturb the finding of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.