Edgar v. Citraro
John F. Edgar v. Frank Citraro, Defendants C.D. Pratt
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- Franklin A. Griffin
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM CASES. THE COURT.
Plaintiffs obtained a judgment for damages against both of the defendants in the above-entitled action, and the latter took separate appeals which are presented on separate records. [1] On the companion appeal, taken by the defendant Citraro, which we have this day held to be without merit (Edgar v. Citraro (No. 7069), ante, p. 183 [297 P. 653]), we considered also and determined adversely all questions raised by the defendant Pratt on the present appeal. The judgment as to the defendant Pratt is therefore affirmed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on March 27, 1931, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 23, 1931. *Page 762
Cites, in this corpus
- Edgar v. Citraro Docket No. 7069. · 1931-02-25