gno.law

Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2303. Civ. No. 2301. · 1918-03-12 · Published · 172 P. 614 · 36 Cal. App. 816 · 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 531

James D. Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings, James D. Halsted v. Central Savings Bank

Proceeding
appeal from judgments
Trial court
Superior Court of Alameda County
Trial judge
W. H. Thomas
Outcome
other — Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion in Halsted et al. v.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The facts of these two cases are such as to present the same question that we have this day decided inJames D. Halsted et al. v. Central Savings Bank, ante, p. 500, [172 P. 613], numbered in this court No. 2302. In all the cases the plaintiffs, as executors of the last will of James M. Halsted, deceased, are seeking to establish an interest in certain savings bank deposits belonging to the deceased in his lifetime, but in which he had created an interest in favor of Anna N. Collins amounting upon his death to absolute and sole ownership.

Upon the authority of the above-mentioned case of Halsted etal. v. Central Savings Bank, No. 2302, the judgment in each of these cases is affirmed.

A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 9, 1918. *Page 817

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by