Williams v. City of Piedmont
Alice J. Williams v. City of Piedmont, a Municipal Corporation, appellant.H.S. Harris v. City of Piedmont, a Municipal Corporation, appellant.francis E. Reynolds v. City of Piedmont, a Municipal Corporation
- Proceeding
- appeal from judgments
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Alameda County
- Trial judge
- John J. Allen
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- George A. Sturtevant (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
From each of three declaratory judgments the defendant has appealed. [1] In each case the point is made that the trial court had no jurisdiction to determine the validity of Ordinance No. 268 of the City of Piedmont. On the authority of Andrews v.City of Piedmont (No. 6624), ante, p. 700 [281 P. 78], this day filed, the point may not be sustained. In the view we take of the record it is unnecessary to discuss either of the other two points made by the defendant.
Each of the judgments is affirmed.
Koford, P.J., and Nourse, J., concurred.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- Andrews v. City of Piedmont Docket No. 6624. · 1929-09-24