Depavo v. Rizzo
F. Depavo v. N. Rizzo
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Alameda County
- Trial judge
- H. Donahue
- Outcome
- other — The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Depavo v. Rizzo, ante. p.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the judgment by the defendant Elizabeth Piepenberg and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The facts are the same as in the case bearing the same name as the present, ante, p. 200, [149 P. 793], but numbered 1494, this day decided. Both appeals are from the same judgment, but taken by different defendants and by different methods. The points here urged in support of the appeal are there considered and decided, and the conclusion reached that the case should be reversed. For the reasons there given the judgment against this appellant should also be reversed, as also the order denying her motion for a new trial, and it is so ordered. *Page 794
Cites, in this corpus
- Depavo v. Rizzo Civ. No. 1494. · 1915-04-21