gno.law

Matter of Hunter

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 545. · 1920-12-07 · Published · 195 P. 79 · 50 Cal. App. 803 · 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 157

In the Matter of the Application of Pearl Hunter for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Outcome
remanded — PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure the release of a minor committed to and detained in a county detention home. Writ discharged and petitioner remanded. The facts are identical with those in In re Hunter, ante, p. 285, [ 195 P. 76 ].
Area
other
Panel
Anderson (author), <italic>pro tem.</italic> &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

At the time of the hearing of the above-entitled matter it was stipulated by counsel for the respective parties herein that the decision rendered in the proceeding entitled, "In theMatter of the Application of Ruby Hunter for a Writ of HabeasCorpus, Crim. No. 544," ante, p. 285, [195 P. 76], should be decisive of the application in the proceeding herein; and, inasmuch as we find that the applications, and the points and contentions in relation thereto, are identical in both cases — It is therefore ordered that upon the authority of the decision rendered in the proceeding entitled, "In the Matter ofthe Application of Ruby Hunter for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Crim. No. 544," ante, p. 285, [195 P. 76], the writ herein be discharged and the petitioner remanded.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred. *Page 804

Cites, in this corpus