Hoopes v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Emma Hoopes v. the Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Outcome
- writ granted — PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the dismissal of a Justice's Court appeal. Peremptory writ granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Craig (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Petitioners herein were defendants in an action commenced in the justice's court of Los Angeles township by one Jay Smith.[1] Otherwise the record before us in this proceeding is the same in all respects as that presented in Hoopes v. SuperiorCourt, ante, p. 564 [235 P. 739.]
The questions involved herein have been discussed and decided in the opinion filed in case numbered 4939 (ante, p. 564).
The peremptory writ of mandate is therefore granted, and the Superior Court is directed to dismiss the appeal.
Finlayson, P.J., and Works, J., concurred.
*Page 800
Cites, in this corpus
- Hoopes v. Superior Court Docket No. 4939. · 1925-03-06