gno.law

Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 8792. · 1932-11-30 · Published · 16 P.2d 312 · 127 Cal. App. 758 · 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 519

Toshi Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association (A Corporation)

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Under the authority of section 3, Rule V, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, respondent moves to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the ground that the appeal was *Page 759 taken for delay only and that the questions on which the decision of the case depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. After examining the transcript on appeal in connection with the points made in appellant's brief it is our opinion that the appeal presents a debatable question of law, and therefore the motion is denied.

Thompson (R.L.), J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Cited by