gno.law

People v. Perry

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 153. · 1911-08-08 · Published · 117 P. 1036 · 16 Cal. App. 771 · 1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 236

The PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ARNETT F. PERRY, Appellant

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Nevada County
Trial judge
L. Jones
Outcome
other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. [Crim. No.
Area
criminal
Panel
Hart (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Hart

HART, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of obtaining from one Ed. Arthur the sum of $500 by false and fraudulent representations and pretenses.

The appeal to this court is from the judgment and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

No brief has been filed in behalf of the defendant, and, therefore, if there were errors made in the trial of the cause which would merit special consideration by this court, we have not been apprised of them.

This court is not required, in the absence of special assignments, in some form, of alleged error, to search the record for the purpose of determining whether the trial in the court "below was in all respects conducted, without prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused.

We have, however, taken the pains to carefully read the stenographer’s transcription of the testimony, and we have from such investigation discovered no reason for questioning its sufficiency to justify and support the verdict.

The judgment and order are, accordingly, affirmed.

Burnett, J., and Chipman, P. J., concurred.

Cited by