Llewellyn Iron Works v. McLain
LLEWELLYN IRON WORKS (A Corporation), Appellant, v. AGNES McLAIN, Respondent
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Charles S. Burnell
- Outcome
- dismissed — Dismissed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
By its complaint filed herein plaintiff sought to have a certain judgment, which was entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, set aside and annulled and execution thereof enjoined upon the grounds of alleged fraud, mistake, and want of jurisdiction. A demurrer interposed to the complaint by defendant was sustained without leave to amend, followed by a judgment dismissing the action, from which plaintiff has appealed.
[1]
The judgment attacked and which it is sought to have annulled and set aside is that entered in the case titled McLain v. Llewellyn Iron Works, ante, p. 60. [204 Pac. 869], wherein, on an appeal therefrom by the defendant therein, who is plaintiff in the instant case, an opinion was filed in this court on January 6, 1922, reversing the judgment so appealed from. The effect of the order so made in that case is to set aside and annul the *791 judgment which is made the subject of plaintiff’s attack in this action. Hence the record presents a moot question only, and- for that reason the appeal is dismissed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on February 3, 1922, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on March 6, 1922.
All the Justices concurred.
Lennon, J., was absent and Richards, J., pro iem., was acting.