San Luis Obispo v. Smith
The County of San Luis Obispo v. Frank H. Smith
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County
- Trial judge
- E. P. Unangst
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
No briefs have been filed herein. It appears, however, by a stipulation filed in this court on July 28, 1910, that the point involved, to wit: the constitutionality of an act of the legislature of the state of California entitled "An act to provide for the payment by the state, or counties, or cities, or cities and counties, of the premium or charge on official bonds when given by surety companies," approved March 25, 1903, [Stats. 1903, p. 476], is identical with the question presented in County of San Luis Obispo v. Murphy, 162 Cal. 588, [123 P. 808], wherein, by an opinion *Page 56 of the supreme court filed April 11, 1912, the said act was declared constitutional and valid. Upon the authority of that case and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- County of San Luis Obispo v. Murphy L.A. No. 2726. · 1912-04-11