Hadsall v. Case
H. S. HADSALL, Respondent, v. FRED H. CASE, FRANK CASE and HENRY W. HINZE, Respondents. MICHAEL M. FERNANDEZ, Intervenor, Appellant
- Proceeding
- appeal from an order
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Orange County
- Trial judge
- Z. B. West
- Outcome
- other — [Civ. No. 927.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Shaw (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Shaw
SHAW, J.
By leave of court, Michael M. Fernandez filed his complaint in intervention in the above-entitled action. A demurrer interposed thereto was sustained; whereupon, within the time granted for so doing, he filed 'an amended complaint in intervention, to which both plaintiff and defendants interposed demurrers. The several demurrers were sustained without leave to amend, and the purported appeal is from the order sustaining the demurrers.
An appeal does not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer, but such ruling may be reviewed on an appeal from the judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939;
Ashley v. Olmstead, 54 Cal. 616;
Agard v. Valencia, 39 Cal. 292.) The rules applicable to pleadings in general apply with equal force to pleadings in intervention. The demurrers interposed to the complaint of the intervenor raised an issue of law, which, upon trial, by sustaining the demurrers, the court determined in favor of the parties so demurring. Judgment against the intervenor, as in other cases where a demurrer to a complaint is sustained without leave to amend, should have followed, from which, inasmuch as to him it was a final determination of the case, he could have prosecuted his appeal at once and thus have the order of which he complains reviewed.
The purported appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
AUen, P. J., and James, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Ashley v. Olmstead No. 6,968 · 1880-07-01
- Agard v. Valencia No. 1,877 · 1870-07-01
Cited by
- Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa Rosa Civ. 42063 · 1978-12-01
- City of Napa v. Maxwell Civ. No. 1755. · 1918-01-31
- Baldwin v. Walls Civ. No. 1141. · 1913-11-25
- Baldwin v. Walls Civ. No. 1141 · 1913-11-25