gno.law

Starkweather v. Eddy

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 8215. · 1932-01-22 · Published · 7 P.2d 744 · 120 Cal. App. 121 · 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 90

J.W. Starkweather v. F.J. Eddy

Outcome
dismissed — MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. M.G. Woodward, Judge. Appeal dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Area
civil
Panel
Craig (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The plaintiff and respondent moved to dismiss the appeal in the instant case upon the ground that *Page 122 the same was not pursued in this court within the time prescribed by law.

[1] Nothing more than the filing and serving of a notice of appeal appears to have been accomplished prior to expiration of the time for ordering a transcript. The motion to dismiss is not resisted, and since it falls squarely within the purview ofGeneral Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal.App. 17 [217 P. 1086], said motion should be granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Fricke, J., pro tem., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus