In Re Shaw
In the Matter of the Petition of George K. Shaw for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petition for habeas corpus. It appears affirmatively from the petition that the applicant has heretofore applied to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco for a writ of habeas corpus and that this proceeding is still pending and undetermined. [1] It is a general rule of wide application that a court is without jurisdiction where it attempts by habeas corpus to interfere with the exercise by another court of jurisdiction theretofore acquired in a habeas corpus proceeding, unless the prior jurisdiction has been terminated.
The application is denied. *Page 25
Cited by
- People v. Getty Crim. 26393 · 1975-07-23
- In Re Browning Crim. 4555 · 1950-09-05