gno.law

Calif. Highway Commr. v. Indus. Accident Commr.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 4431. · 1923-03-07 · Published · 214 P. 998 · 61 Cal. App. 800 · 1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 584

California Highway Commission v. Industrial Accident Commission

Proceeding
writ
Outcome
other — 284.
Area
civil
Panel
William H. Langdon (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This matter comes to us upon a writ of review and we are asked to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission made to respondent H. H. Newberry because of injuries sustained by him and which said commission has found were sustained "in the course of and arising out of his employment."

Applicant was injured in the accident out of which arose the case of California Highway Com. v. Industrial Acc. Com., ante, p. 284 [214 P. 658]. It was stipulated that the law and the facts in that case and in this one were identical. It is unnecessary, therefore, to set out the facts herein, as they are discussed in the opinion filed in the parallel case. [1] Upon the authority of that decision, and for the reasons stated therein, the award of the Industrial Accident Commission made herein is annulled.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus