gno.law

Lowell v. the United Properties Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 3722. · 1921-07-07 · Published · 200 P. 369 · 53 Cal. App. 798 · 1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 432

Cedelia M. Lowell v. the United Properties Company of California (A Corporation)

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Alameda County
Trial judge
T. W. Harris
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
John T. Nourse (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Plaintiff recovered judgment for ten thousand dollars and interest against the defendant for breach of its contract to deliver certain bonds to plaintiff in accordance with certain written agreements designated as bond certificates issued to plaintiff's assignor. The facts of the case are identical with those considered in Snyder v. United Properties Company ofCalifornia, ante, p. 428, [200 P. 366], and by stipulation of counsel this appeal has been submitted upon the same set of briefs.

For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred. *Page 799

Cites, in this corpus