gno.law

Lapique v. Walsh

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2230. · 1917-03-26 · Published · 165 P.2d 57 · 33 Cal. App. 807 · 165 P. 56 · 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 408

John Lapique v. Frank E. Walsh, Administrator of the Estate of Laurent Etchepare

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Fred H. Taft
Outcome
other — The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Lapique v. Plummer, ante, p. 317.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

It appearing that the facts in this case are identical with those involved in Civil No. 2231, entitled John Lapique,Appellant, v. Eugene R. Plummer et al., Respondents, ante, p. 317, wherein an opinion was this day filed dismissing the appeal, it is ordered, upon the authority of the opinion so filed in said last-mentioned case, that the appeal herein be and the same is dismissed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 24, 1917.