gno.law

Aizenberg v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 1561. · 1915-09-02 · Published · 152 P. 313 · 28 Cal. App. 326 · 1915 Cal. App. LEXIS 272

Max Aizenberg v. O. F. Anderson

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial
Trial judge
E. P. Mogan
Outcome
affirmed — order are affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The only point presented upon this appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment of the court. Upon a careful examination of the record we find that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence in respect to those findings of which the appellants complain; and that this being so, the findings and judgment of the trial court will not be disturbed upon appeal.

The judgment and order are affirmed.