gno.law

County of Los Angeles v. Daniels

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2546. · 1923-10-31 · Published · 222 P.2d 157 · 64 Cal. App. 790 · 222 P. 157

County of Los Angeles v. Gilbert B. Daniels

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Sacramento County
Trial judge
Peter J. Shields
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
Plummer (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This is an action praying for the issuance of a writ of mandate requiring the board of control to audit and allow the claim of the County of Los Angeles for the sum of $12,963.48. The trial court sustained the defendants' demurrer to the petitioner's petition without leave to amend. The matter is now before this court on appeal from the judgment entered after the sustaining of the respondents' demurrer as aforesaid. The same questions are involved in this action as were presented for determination in the case of County of Los Angeles v. State,ante, p. 291. [222 P. 153]. For the reasons therein given, we think the writ of mandate was properly denied, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Finch, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred. *Page 791

Cites, in this corpus