Kearney v. Pierson
Hattie M. Kearney v. J. W. Pierson
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Alameda County
- Trial judge
- T. W. Harris
- Outcome
- affirmed — the judgment is affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Hall (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This case is in all respects similar to the case ofHattie M. Kearney v. John Palmer et al., ante, p. 517, [123 P. 611], save that the action is one in ejectment and not *Page 522 to quiet title, and for the same reasons the judgment is affirmed.
Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 15, 1912.
Cites, in this corpus
- Kearney v. Palmer Civ. No. 1016. · 1912-03-15