gno.law

In Re Rheinschild

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 5567. · 1927-03-23 · Published · 254 P. 931 · 82 Cal. App. 16 · 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 720

Petition for Reinstatement of Walter M. Rheinschild as Attorney at Law.

Area
other
Panel
John D. Works (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Petitioner was admitted to the bar in 1909 and he was disbarred in 1919. He petitions for a reinstatement in the ranks of the profession.

[1] Petitioner has produced satisfactory and convincing evidence that he has conducted himself with the highest degree of honesty and integrity during the nearly eight years that have elapsed since he was deprived of his license to practice.

Upon the score of his mental qualifications, we are satisfied from the evidence that he has kept up a practically constant study of the law since his disbarment and that he is possessed of the necessary qualifications to entitle him to a reinstatement. *Page 17 These conclusions bring him within the rules stated in the opinions In re Stevens, 197 Cal. 408 [241 P. 88], and In reCate, 77 Cal.App. 495 [247 P. 231].

Petition granted.

Craig, J., and Thompson, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus