gno.law

Tidewater Southern Railway Company v. Frame

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 1805. · 1917-01-12 · Published · 163 P. 720 · 32 Cal. App. 806 · 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 534

Tidewater Southern Railway Company (A Corporation) v. W. W. Frame

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Fresno County
Trial judge
H. Z. Austin
Outcome
other — The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Tidewater Southern Railway Company v. Vance, 31 Cal.App. 503 .
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

It is conceded by the appellant that this case is in all essential particulars as to its facts identical with the case of Tidewater Southern Railway Company v. Vance,31 Cal.App. 503. This being so, it follows upon the authority of that case the judgment herein will be affirmed, and it is so ordered. *Page 807

Cites, in this corpus