gno.law

People v. Safasr

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 628. · 1922-06-05 · Published · 207 P. 907 · 58 Cal. App. 95 · 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 130

The People v. John Safasr

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Sacramento County
Trial judge
Malcolm C. Glenn
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
criminal
Panel
Finch (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The defendant was convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property and appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

[1] No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant and his counsel failed to appear at the time set for oral argument. An examination of the record on appeal discloses no error.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.