Pacific Marine Products Co. v. Fish and Game Comm.
Pacific Marine Products Company, Inc. (A Corporation) v. Fish and Game Commission
- Proceeding
- writ
- Outcome
- other — Writ discharged.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Frederick W. Houser (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The pleadings, the facts, the relief sought by the petitioner, and the contentions of respective counsel in all essential particulars are identical with those set forth in the case ofVan Camp Sea Food Co., Inc., v. Fish and Game Commission,ante, p. 764 [243 P. 702]. [1] Relying *Page 792 upon that case as an authority, it is ordered that the demurrer to the petition be and it is sustained, and that the writ heretofore issued herein be and the same is discharged.
Conrey, P.J., and Curtis, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Fish & Game Commission Docket No. 5223. · 1925-12-23