gno.law

Miller Lux Inc. v. Starkey

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 1034. · 1932-10-17 · Published · 15 P.2d 185 · 127 Cal. App. 79

Miller Lux Incorporated (A Corporation) v. W.W. Starkey

Outcome
dismissed — MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H.Z. Austin, Judge. Appeal dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Area
civil
Panel
Charles R. Barnard (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no transcript has been filed within the time allowed.

[1] It appears, by certificate of the county clerk, that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932, that no proceedings have been begun for the preparation or settlement of either a transcript or a bill of exceptions, that no such proceedings are pending, and that the time therefor has expired. The motion should be granted. (People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College,103 Cal.App. 139 [283 P. 981].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

*Page 80

Cites, in this corpus