Gentry v. Maxwell
I.H. Gentry v. James B. Maxwell
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Riverside County
- Trial judge
- O.K. Morton
- Outcome
- dismissed — Appeal dismissed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Charles R. Barnard (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
A printed transcript was filed on August 31, 1931. [1] No brief having been filed by either party, this court, on its own motion, noticed an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for September 12, 1933.
No cause being shown and no appearance having been made, the appeal is dismissed.
Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred. *Page 194
Cited by
- Tompkins v. Tompkins Civ. 25564 · 1962-04-02
- Miller v. Schell Civ. 17063 · 1957-03-21
- Morgan v. Morgan Civ. 18184 · 1951-08-20
- Jackson v. Utica Light & Power Co. Civ. No. 12518 · 1944-06-15
- Brown v. George Pepperdine Foundation L. A. 18743 · 1943-12-07
- Cornell v. Hearst Sunical Land & Packing Corp. Civ. 13644 · 1942-11-28