Dale Consolidated Mines v. Wright
DALE CONSOLIDATED MINES (A Corporation), Appellant, v. ESTHER E. WRIGHT Et Al., Respondents
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Bernardino County
- Outcome
- dismissed — Appeal dismissed on motion. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. [Civ. No. 1489. Fourth Appellate District. November 27, 1933.] DALE CONSOLIDATED MINES (a Corporation), Appellant, v. ESTHER E. WRIGHT et al., Respondents.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Marks (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Marks
MARKS, J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. A certificate of the county clerk of San Bernardino County *476 filed in support of the motion shows that judgment was rendered in the court below; that appellant’s motion for new trial was denied on the 18th of July, 1933; that notice of denial of such motion was served on the nineteenth day of July, 1933; that notice of appeal was filed on the sixteenth day of August, 1933, together with a notice to prepare a typewritten transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no undertaking or security for costs was given nor any private arrangements made with the clerk for the cost of the preparation of such transcript; that no bill of exceptions was filed, and that no proceedings are pending for a settlement of such bill; that no transcript on appeal has been prepared under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.
As no record on appeal has been prepared or filed, and the time for such filing has expired, ■ the appeal is dismissed. (Sec. 1, Rule V, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.)
Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.