Westphal v. Superior Court
Edward W. Westphal v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Proceeding
- writ
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- Frank H. Dunne
- Outcome
- writ granted — thereof, to prevent a receiver from interfering with petitioner's property. Writ granted.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Application for writ of prohibition to prevent a receiver appointed by respondent court from further interfering with the property of petitioner.
[1] It is claimed the appointment was void for the reason that there was a noncompliance with the provisions of section 566 of the Code of Civil Procedure with reference to the bond required by that section. Under authority of Ryan v. Murphy,39 Cal.App. 640 [179 P. 517], Van Alen v. Superior Court,37 Cal.App. 696 [174 P. 672], Bibby v. Dieter, 15 Cal.App. 45 [113 P. 874], and Davila v. Heath, 13 Cal.App. 370 [109 P. 893], the writ is granted.
Cites, in this corpus
- Ryan v. Murphy Civ. No. 2387. · 1919-02-07
- Van Alen v. Superior Court Civ. No. 2696. · 1918-06-28
- Bibby v. Dieter Civ. No. 754. · 1910-12-15
- Davila v. Heath Civ. No. 594. · 1910-05-09
Cited by
- Sweins v. Superior Court Civ. No. 10307 · 1936-08-28