gno.law

Stephens v. Lemoore Canal Irrigation Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 1125. · 1913-08-16 · Published · 135 P. 713 · 22 Cal. App. 809 · 1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 72

Katie N. Stephens v. the Lemoore Canal Irrigation Company, and Appellant Emma E. McKenna, of the Last Will of Richard E. McKenna, Intervener And

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Kings County
Trial judge
John G. Covert
Outcome
affirmed — order are affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
Chipman (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This appeal is by the defendant company and was referred to in our opinion in the same case No. 1113, Stephens v. LemooreLand Irrigation Co., ante, p. 579, [135 P. 707], this day decided. The questions here presented are the same as were considered and decided in No. 1113 and, for the reason there given, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.

*Page 1

Cites, in this corpus