gno.law

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 710. · 1918-05-13 · Published · 174 P. 91 · 37 Cal. App. 213 · 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 274

The People v. Edward Martin

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
George H. Cabaniss
Outcome
affirmed — order be affirmed.
Area
criminal
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

In this case the appellant failed to file a brief in support of his appeal, or to appear before the court on the date set for the argument thereof, and the appeal might properly have been dismissed upon that ground. We have, *Page 214 however, carefully examined the record, and find that there was sufficient evidence to support the judgment, that the court fairly instructed the jury, and that there were no errors in the admission or rejection of evidence.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment and order be affirmed.