gno.law

Los Angeles Shipbuilding v. Indus. Acc. Comm.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 3824. · 1922-04-15 · Published · 207 P. 419 · 57 Cal. App. 792 · 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 426

Los Angeles Shipbuilding Drydock Company (A Corporation) v. Industrial Accident Commission

Proceeding
writ
Outcome
affirmed — PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. Affirmed. The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Los Angeles Shipbuilding Drydock Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., ante, p. 352.
Area
civil
Panel
Frank G. Finlayson (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This is a proceeding in certiorari to review the award of the Industrial Accident Commission in favor of one J. M. Bush. [1] The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in LosAngeles Shipbuilding Drydock Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.,ante, p. 352 [207 P. 417]. The opinion in that case disposes of the fundamental questions involved here, and the award of the commission is, therefore, affirmed.

Works, J., and Craig, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 12, 1922.

All the Justices concurred. *Page 793