Matter of Application of Worthington
In the Matter of the Application of George Worthington for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
- Area
- other
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
It appearing to the court that the act which petitioner is charged with having violated is one entitled, an act governing the use of automobiles upon public highways, and it not being averred in the complaint that the defendant used or operated his automobile upon a public highway, the complaint failed to state any public offense, and for that reason it is ordered that petitioner be discharged, and that the money deposited in lieu of bail be returned. *Page 498
Cited by
- People v. Stansberry Crim. 11878 · 1966-05-12
- People v. Knight Crim. 1701 · 1939-11-16
- People v. Stanley Crim. No. 2854 · 1936-04-29
- People v. Hoenschle Docket No. 1250. · 1933-06-01
- In Re Hernandez Crim. No. 985. · 1923-10-04
- Dorris v. McKamy Civ. No. 2870. Second Appellate District, Division Two. · 1919-03-13