gno.law

People v. Parker

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 949. · 1921-08-26 · Published · 200 P. 293 · 54 Cal. App. 101 · 1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 406

The People v. William H. Parker

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Alameda County
Trial judge
Lincoln S. Church
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
criminal
Panel
William H. Langdon (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Defendant was convicted by a jury of the offense designated "pimping" in an act approved February 8, 1911, and found in Statutes of 1911 at page *Page 102 10. He moved for a new trial, which motion was denied, as was also his motion for probation, after the filing of the report of the probation officer thereon. From the judgment of the court rendered herein the defendant appeals. The appeal is based solely upon the claim of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. No useful purpose would be served by a review of the evidence in this opinion. [1] The evidence is ample to support the verdict, and we think no other verdict could have been reached by the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.