gno.law

Southern Pacific Company v. Sharp

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2069. · 1917-09-04 · Published · 168 P. 148 · 34 Cal. App. 803 · 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 178

Southern Pacific Company (A Corporation) v. William B. Sharp

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
Edward P. Shortall
Outcome
other — The facts are similar to those stated in Southern Pacific Co. v. Dore et al., ante, p.
Area
civil
Panel
Frank H. Kerrigan (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

As in the case of the same plaintiff against Ellen Dore et al., No. 2068 (ante, p. 521, [168 P. 147]), this day decided, the appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants after demurrer sustained to the complaint. It presents the same point as did that case, and the question was submitted and argued on the same briefs. The conclusion arrived at there is controlling here, and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment here is affirmed.

Richards, J., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 3, 1917. *Page 804

Cites, in this corpus