North P. S. S. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.
North Pacific Steamship Company v. Industrial Accident Commission, Respondents William T. Soley, Applicant.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Conceding that the record upon this application for a writ of review directed to the Industrial Accident Commission shows that the award of the commission on its face was beyond and in excess of the jurisdiction of the commission, nevertheless it also appears that the petition for the writ to this court was not made within the thirty days after the award of the commission as prescribed by the statute. That statute, we think, must be regarded as a statute of limitations in so far as the right of the petitioner to apply for the writ is concerned, and the application has not been made within the statutory time. We are compelled, therefore, to dismiss the writ, and that will be the order.
Cited by
- Goodrich v. Indus. Accident Comm'n L. A. 18601 · 1943-08-03
- National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission Civ. No. 14104 · 1943-05-04
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Soley S. F. No. 10435. · 1924-02-01
- Thaxter v. Finn S. F. No. 8223. In Bank. · 1918-05-11