gno.law

Victor Power and Mining Co. v. Zerr

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 652. · 1909-10-18 · Published · 105 P. 761 · 11 Cal. App. 503 · 1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 120

Victor Power and Mining Company, a Corporation v. G. Zerr

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Tehama County
Trial judge
M. Finch
Outcome
other — presiding. The facts appearing in the record as to the negligence of the attorney for the defendant appealing are the same as those which appear in case No. 651, ante, p.
Area
civil
Panel
Hart (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This is an action, ejectment in form, and the appeal is from the judgment and an order refusing to grant the motion of the defendant to set aside the default entered against him for failure to answer the complaint within the time allowed by the court upon overruling the demurrer to said complaint and to vacate the judgment entered upon said default.

The facts and the law pertinent thereto are, confessedly, similar to those in the case of the plaintiff herein against C. L. Cole — No. 651, ante, p. 497, [105 P. 758] — an opinion in which has this day been filed.

It therefore follows that, upon the authority of said case No. 651, the judgment and the order appealed from herein must be affirmed, and such is the order.

Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred. *Page 505

Cites, in this corpus