People v. Zerman
The People v. Edward Zerman
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial
- Trial judge
- Frank H. Dunne
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
We are satisfied that the point made in this case in support of the appeal is not well taken, — namely, that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgment. From a reading and consideration of the evidence we are satisfied that the contrary is the case. The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Cited by
- People v. Peckham Crim. 11673 · 1967-04-03
- People v. Swanson Crim. 7772 · 1962-05-28
- People v. Mendoza Crim. No. 745 · 1951-03-27
- People v. Cannon Crim. 3988 · 1947-01-17
- People v. Holman Crim. 2329 · 1945-12-07
- People v. McBride Crim. No. 3859 · 1945-05-28
- People v. Jackson Crim. 1852 · 1944-03-29
- People v. Meyers Crim. 2262 · 1943-12-21
- People v. Holquin Crim. 3515 · 1941-12-18
- People v. Johnson Crim. 2150 · 1941-07-16
- People v. Moreno Crim. 3097 · 1938-05-13
- People v. Chaddock Crim. 2617 · 1934-12-06
- People v. Becker Crim. No. 2553 · 1934-07-25
- Winning v. Board of Dental Examiners Docket No. 323. · 1931-06-08