Dawson v. Board of Civil Service Commrs.
William James Dawson v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Carl A. Stutsman
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Homer R. Spence (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This is a companion case to Jenkins v. Board of CivilService Commission, (Civil No. 9356) ante, p. 410 [30 P.2d 606], the opinion in which last-named case has been this day filed. *Page 415 [1] The pleadings, evidence, findings, judgments and briefs in the two cases are practically the same. Plaintiff herein was employed as a carpenter foreman in charge of the construction work on substation No. 4. Plaintiff's employment was terminated at the time of the termination of the employment of the plaintiff in the Jenkins case. The construction work on said substation upon which plaintiff was engaged had been completed at that time and there was but one other substation still under construction. The evidence herein regarding lack of work and lack of funds amply supports the findings on these issues and the trial court properly denied the writ.
The judgment is affirmed.
Nourse, P.J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Jenkins v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners Docket No. 9356. · 1934-03-19