People v. Ernsting
The People v. Frederick Ernsting
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Imperial County
- Trial judge
- M. W. Conkling
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Frederick W. Houser (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This is an appeal by the people of the state of California from a judgment in favor of defendant on a demurrer to an information which charged defendant with the violation of an order of the Railroad Commission of this state.
[1] The facts are identical with those recited in the case ofPeople v. Hadley, ante, p. 370 [226 P. 836], and relying upon that case as an authority herein, it is ordered that the judgment be and the same is affirmed.
Conrey, P. J., and Curtis, J., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 26, 1924.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Hadley Crim. No. 1031. · 1924-03-27