Gallagher v. Voyce
E.J. Gallagher v. Alfred Voyce, Jr.
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- Walter Perry Johnson
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] The opinion in the above-entitled action filed July 12, 1929 (Gallagher v. Voyce, 99 Cal.App. 791 [279 P. 490]), was responsive to the appeal taken in that certain action numbered 146089 of the records of the Superior Court of the state of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco. By stipulation of the parties another action, numbered 146087,E.J. Gallagher, Plaintiff, v. J.W. Wright Sons Investment Co.,a Corporation, et al., Defendants, records of the same court, involving identical points, was consolidated with the action first named, and it was further stipulated that the decision of this court in the action first named should control and constitute the decision on appeal in the action last named. Therefore the judgment in action 146087 of the records of the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Gallagher v. Voyce Docket No. 6660. · 1929-07-12