Cremer v. Albers Bros. Milling Co.
ORAN P. CREMER Et Al., Respondents, v. ALBERS BROS. MILLING CO. (A Corporation) Et Al., Appellants; ORAN P. CREMER, Respondent, v. ALBERS BROS. MILLING CO. (A Corporation) Et Al., Appellants
- Proceeding
- appeal from judgments
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Percy Hight
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Hahn (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Hahn
HAHN, J., pro tem.
Defendants appeal from a consolidated judgment rendered against them in two actions arising out of an automobile accident and which by stipulation were tried at the same time. Both appeals, by stipulation, are before us on the same record.
In support of their contentions for a reversal of the judgments appellants urge:
1st. That the evidence does not support the implied finding of the jury that the defendants were negligent, but does show conclusively as a matter of law that the plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence.
*567 2d. That the court committed reversible error in the matter of giving certain instructions requested by plaintiffs.
The record clearly shows a marked conflict in the evidence on several material matters. That this court may not, under such circumstances, interfere with the judgment is too well established to require further comment.
Nor is there merit in the point that the trial court committed error in the instructions given. We have examined the instructions given and are satisfied that as a whole they correctly state the law applicable to the case.
Judgments are affirmed.
Stephens, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.