Pacific Union Club v. Palatine Ins. Co.
Pacific Union Club v. Palatine Insurance Company
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- J. M. Seawell
- Outcome
- affirmed — the judgment is affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Chipman (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Appellant states in its opening brief that the facts in this case are identical with those in Pacific Union Club v.Commercial Union Assurance Company, ante, p. 503, [107 P. 728], this day decided.
Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Pacific Union Club v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. Civ. No. 666. · 1910-01-26
Cited by
- Hammon v. American Exploration & Mining Co. Civ. 19815 · 1962-05-08
- Heffernan v. Bennett & Armour Civ. 12535 · 1944-03-03
- Blackman v. Sherman Civ. No. 6237 · 1940-10-02
- Turlock Theatre Co. v. Laws Sac. 5258 · 1939-01-12
- Kopke v. Carlson Docket No. 6742. · 1929-04-06
- O'Gorman v. Wachter Docket No. 2887. · 1925-02-13
- Lefurgey v. Prentice Civ. No. 1772. · 1918-02-20
- Terry v. Rivergarden Farms Co. Civ. No. 1413. · 1915-11-29