gno.law

Clark v. Sheperd

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 3306. · 1920-03-22 · Published · 189 P. 725 · 46 Cal. App. 677 · 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 731

S. N. Clark v. L. E. Shepherd

Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

[1] This is an application for a writ ofmandamus. The application is based upon private rights only. The matters to be litigated are not publici juris. Nor does it appear that some peculiar emergency or exigency exists such as would justify the issuance of the writ by this court in the first instance. The petition shows no sufficient reason why the application should not have been made to the superior court, and the application for the writ is therefore denied. *Page 678

Cited by