Harlow v. Federal Insurance Company of New Jersey
C. Fred Harlow v. Federal Insurance Company of New Jersey (A Corporation)
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Albert Lee Stephens
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM CASES. THE COURT.
The facts of this case are in all respects, except as to the names of the defendants, identical with those in Harlow v.American Equitable Assur. Co., ante, p. 28 [261 P. 499].[1] On the grounds stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment herein is affirmed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on December 17, 1927, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on January 16, 1928.
All the Justices concurred. *Page 793
Cites, in this corpus
- Harlow v. American Equitable Assurance Co. Docket No. 3366. · 1927-11-18