gno.law

Bamberger-Stern Co. v. Baer

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2088. · 1917-09-19 · Published · 168 P. 390 · 34 Cal. App. 692 · 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 210

Bamberger-Stern Co. (A Corporation) v. Hermine Baer

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
Daniel C. Deasy
Outcome
other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The judgment in this case was against the defendant upon a complaint for the purchase price of goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to her. The findings of the trial court were to the effect that both the defendant and Joseph Baer, her husband, each ordered and each individually agreed to pay for the goods so sold and delivered; and the only point involved upon the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support these findings as to the defendant. An examination of the record discloses some evidence supporting them in this particular; and as they in turn support the judgment, it follows that this court will not disturb it.

Judgment affirmed. *Page 693