Sanguinetti v. Ramsey
Henry Sanguinetti v. W.C. Ramsey
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Joaquin County
- Trial judge
- C. W. Miller
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The defendants have appealed from the judgment herein in favor of the plaintiff.
[1] This cause and that of Mazzera v. Ramsey et al.,ante, p. 601 [238 P. 101], were on the calendar for oral argument at the same time. In lieu of oral argument, each party has filed a single brief, covering both cases. In appellant's brief it is said: "The appeals in both cases are from judgments in favor of the respective owners against sureties upon a faithful performance builders' bond and practically involve the same points, any material differences will be pointed out herein." No material differences have been pointed out and it would serve no useful purpose to repeat what is said in the opinion filed in the Mazzera case.
The judgment is affirmed.
Appellants' petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 7, 1925.
All the Justices concurred.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- Mazzera v. Ramsey Docket No. 2828. · 1925-05-11