Edgar v. Citraro
John F. Edgar v. Frank Citraro, Defendants C.D. Pratt
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- Franklin A. Griffin
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This appeal, taken by the defendant Pratt from the judgment for damages entered herein against both defendants, after verdict by a jury, is companion to the one taken by the defendant Citraro from the same judgment, the appeals having been presented on separate records. [1] We have this day determined the latter appeal adversely to the contentions of the appellant therein (Edgar v. Citraro, (No. 7070), ante, p. 178 [297 P. 654]), and in our decision therein we disposed also of all of the contentions made by the defendant Pratt on the present appeal. Therefore, upon the grounds therein stated, the judgment as to the defendant Pratt is affirmed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on March 27, 1931, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 23, 1931. *Page 763
Cites, in this corpus
- Edgar v. Citraro Docket No. 7070. · 1931-02-25