People v. Reese
The People v. Charles R. Reese
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- Michael J. Roche
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- William H. Langdon (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The defendant was charged by indictment with the crime of robbery. He was convicted and the appeal is from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
[1] It is not contended upon appeal that appellant is innocent of the crime charged, nor that there has been a miscarriage of justice, nor that if the alleged errors had not been committed the verdict might have been different, but the judgment is attacked upon numerous technical grounds only, none of which have any merit whatsoever. Under the circumstances, since the judgment must be affirmed, a discussion of the points raised would serve no useful purpose.
The judgment is affirmed.
Sturtevant, J., and Nourse, J., concurred.