gno.law

Paddon v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 4888. · 1924-02-01 · Published · 224 P. 474 · 65 Cal. App. 479 · 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 591

William Locke Paddon v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco

Proceeding
writ
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
Walter Perry Johnson
Outcome
other — , restraining the taking of certain depositions. While proceedings were pending charging petitioner, William Locke Paddon, with contempt of the orders of the trial court directing him to appear and give his deposition in an action in which he was one of the defendants, petitioners sought to take the
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

[1] It appearing to the court that proceedings were pending charging the petitioner, William Locke Paddon, with contempt of the orders of the trial court at the time the order herein sought to be reviewed was made; and it further appearing that the said William Locke Paddon is the real party in interest herein;

It is ordered that the petition for a writ of prohibition be denied upon the authority of Knoob v. Knoob, 192 Cal. 95 *Page 480 [218 P. 568], Soderberg v. Soderberg, 63 Cal.App. 492 [219 P. 82], and Weeks v. Superior Court, 187 Cal. 620 [203 P. 93].

All the Justices concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on February 21, 1924, and an application by petitioners to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on March 31, 1924.

All the Justices concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by