Ross v. Witter
J. Edgar Ross v. M. D. Witter
- Proceeding
- appeal from an order
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Imperial County
- Trial judge
- Franklin J. Cole
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Louis W. Myers (author), <italic>pro tem.</italic> —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
[1] This case involves the same questions as Ross v. Kalin,ante, p. 616, [200 P. 745], and it was stipulated that the two cases should be heard together. While the affidavits in this case are fewer in number and go less into detail, it is tacitly agreed by the respective counsel in their briefs that the same reasons for and against the granting of the motion obtain in both cases. Therefore, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in Ross v. Kalin, the order appealed from is affirmed.
Finlayson, P. J., and Works, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 19, 1921.
All the Justices concurred, except Shaw, J., who was absent.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- Ross v. Kalin Civ. No. 3571. · 1921-07-21